Democrats in Pro-Trump Districts Won’t Say How They Will Vote on Impeachment

ALEXANDRIA, VA - APRIL 27: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during an event at Northern Virginia Community College April 27, 2018 in Alexandria, Virginia. Pelosi and Democratic leaders unveiled the newest plank of their economic agenda, 'A Better Deal: Tools to Succeed in the 21st Century' during the event. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

House Democrats in Trump-friendly districts are staying mum on how they will vote on articles of impeachment, according to a new report.

The Daily Caller reported it contacted 31 offices of House Democrats from districts where President Donald Trump won in 2016. None of the offices would commit to a vote on impeachment, saying they were “weighing out the facts.”

“This is a somber time,” Angie Craig (R-Mn.) told the Daily Caller. “No one runs for Congress wanting to ever have to face the question of whether to vote for articles of impeachment. Once the articles are voted out of Committee, I plan to review the final resolution in combination with the House Intelligence Committee report over the weekend and make a final decision based on my oath of office.”

On Friday, reports broke that some of those House Democrats had actually attended President Trump’s Christmas party last night.

Together, the news raises fresh questions about how Democrats will split on impeachment.

On Friday, the House Judiciary Committee sent two articles of impeachment against Trump back to the House of Representatives for a vote: abuse of power and obstruction of justice. Wednesday, House Democrat Jeff Van Drew (D-N.J.) said he would vote “no” on impeachment and urged other Democrats to join him.

Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), have long feared the political consequences of impeaching Trump.

This week, they have been acting in an unusually bipartisan manner, helping pass a new trade deal, a bill to reduce the cost of prescription drugs and a gigantic defense spending bill. All of it is part of the Democrats’ effort to show they can both hold Trump accountable and get things done in Congress at the same time.

Of the House Democrats who did respond to The Daily Caller’s inquiries, almost all said they were still reviewing the evidence. On CNN, New York Rep. Anthony Brindisi (D) said he had not made a decision yet.

“I think it’s been a pretty even split so far,” he said of feedback from constituents. “We’re getting a lot of calls, we’ll take that all into consideration and make a decision this weekend.”

What do you think?

8 pledges
Upvote Downvote


newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Phyllis Softa

Allen Zabel, I apologize for using a term that you are unfamiliar. Self proclaimed means designated by oneself. On June 11, 2019 Mitch proudly proclaimed himself the “grime reaper” during a press conference. His campaign website is SELLING Grim Reaper T-shirts. WHAT bills are being tweaked in the Senate? They are not even being sent to committees. AND WHY would you think labor unions should support Republicans—R’s have made it perfectly CLEAR that they support CORPORATIONS, NOT LABOR.—CORPORATIONS NOT CONSUMERS. WHAT R president nominates judges that are PRO-LABOR FORCE or PRO-CONSUMER? Were you of the impression that Eugene Scalia, a… Read more »

General Confusion

“The Grim Reaper, as you call him” Allen Zabel

It isn’t just Phyllis and I that call Moscow Mitch “The Grim Reaper”, he calls himself that. That’s why we use it against him.


Yet…they MUST all go on the record when they do vote. Morons. Even abstention counts historically and with political consequences.

Allen Zabel

The facts are in.
But these gutless wonders, are only worried about their reelection bids.
This is the swamp, that Trump is fighting against.

Phyllis Softa

Jonathan Swan’s own reporting IN THE ARTICLE, indicates Gil Cisneros plans to vote FOR impeachment and attended. Van Drews and Peterson who did not vote for the inquiry, did NOT attend the WH Christmas event. Looking for correlation between a vote and attendance, yet none is presented.

Phyllis Softa

Isaac, WHAT is “unusually bipartisan manner”? A visit to will enlighten you to the number of bipartisan legislation passed in the House in 2019. Click on the “roll call vote.” The self-proclaimed “grim reaper” has failed to act upon many, many of them in the Senate. As far as the trade agreement, it was ratified by Mexico on June 20, 2019. The House received notification from Lighthizer on May 30th, 2019 that a draft measure would be sent to them on or before June 29th. The Ways and Means Committee sent recommended “labor enforcement” additions needed for approval. Lighthizer… Read more »

General Confusion

For all of you Pelosi and Buttigeig fans out there. If you count me among you, you are greatly confused.






U.S. Supreme Court Takes up Trump Bid to Shield Financial Records

Dem Calls for Mcconnell to Recuse Himself From Impeachment After He Says He’ll Coordinate With the WH